The west's silence over Ukrainian missile attacks on Zaporozhye nuclear power station is an indictment of its complicity

18 September 2022

The US, UK and other NATO members and EU are in a proxy war with Russia. The US planned it and instigated it, staged the Maidan riots and the overthrow of the elected government in Ukraine in 2014. Since then NATO members have systematically equipped and trained the Ukrainian military to NATO standards with the intention of giving Ukraine NATO membership and putting nuclear ICBMs in Ukraine pointing at Russia.

This US plan was consistent with the systematic encroachment of its NATO membership into eastern Europe and tresspass in Russia's sphere of interest despite promising not to extend NATO one inch east at the time of German reunification.

They initiated this conflict in 2014 and have supplied billions of dollars worth of equipment, missiles, funding and intelligence with the intention of killing Russians, destroying the Russian economy and structually fragmenting the Russian nation to prevent it from being a challenge to US intentions to have monopolar control.

They know the referenda in Zaporozhye and surrounding areas show the people want their land to be integrated into Russia and that this will happen soon.

The same people who wanted to install nuclear ICBMs in Ukraine are now acquiesing whilst the missiles they made and sent to Ukraine are being fired on the largest nuclear power station in Europe with the possibility of causing nuclear devastation comparable with dropping a nuclear bomb on territory that will soon be Russian.

Were Washington, London, Paris or Berlin in proximity of the NPP they would immediately respond decisively and ensure their safety. That is not their behaviour at the Zaporozhye power station. Their behaviour is consistent with wanting a nuclear disaster in Russia.

  • The UN has obstructed the IAEA. 16 Aug 2022. Here
  • IAEA visit to Zaporozhye NPP falls short. 5 Sept 2022. Article
  • IAEA utterly fails to protect Zaprorzhye NPP. 15 Sept 2022. Item
This is not the immediate, decisive, responsive action of an international agency responsible for overseeing nuclear sites.

This is not a mistake, an accident or an oversight. It is deliberate and intentional.

Had they any intention of preventing these missile attacks they would be forthright, decisive and unambiguous in their actions and instructions. They are not.